GOVERNMENT BY THE JUDGES VS.

government by the people:  the judges win again.  The people of California say, "See you in November."  I say, good luck with that.  The judges have defeated the people time after time in California, no matter how the people vote.  The last big win for the people goes back to the time the people kicked Chief Justice Rose Bird off the bench for attempting to re-write the criminal statues to suit herself.

But count this as a score for Gov. Schwarzenegger.  His lone appointment on the court broke with the Republican dominated majority, writing:


"The principle of judicial restraint is a covenant between judges and the people from whom their power derives....  It is no answer to say that judges can break the covenant so long as they are enlightened or well-meaning....  If there is to be a new understanding of the meaning of marriage in California, it should develop among the people of our state and find its expression at the ballot box."

UPDATE:  When you are talking legal interpretation, a "slippery slope" argument is no fallacy, it's close to an empirical law.

| | Comments (0)

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: GOVERNMENT BY THE JUDGES VS..

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://gregransom.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/288

Leave a comment

Syndication

Greg's Guide to
Dreams from My Father

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Greg Ransom has a degree in Political Science and an advanced degree in Philosophy, with a specialty in the philosophy of science with a special focus on the science of economics. Ransom is well know among scholars writing on the ideas of Friedrich Hayek. Ransom studied with philosophers of science Alex Rosenberg and Larry Wright.