If you want to understand the scope of the subprime mess, consider the fact that only 3 years ago Countrywide loaned money to someone who paid $465,000 for this house in Vista:
The house is now on the market for $180,00. Hat tip Calculated Risk.
Commodities like oil are priced in dollars. So when the dollar becomes weak, the dollar price of commodities goes up. And when the greenback is strong, the dollar price of commodities goes down.In 2004 Alan Greenspan, Chairman of the Federal Reserve, made a fateful miscalculation. The maestro, as he was then affectionately called by an adoring media, miscalculated the strength of the U.S. economy. He thought it weak. He was fearful that prices would collapse in America as they did in Japan during the 1990s and the early part of this decade. So to goose the economy, Greenspan created excessive amounts of money. Interest rates were kept artificially low.
But the economy was not weak. In fact, between 2003 and the summer of 2007, the growth alone of the U.S. economy exceeded the entire size of the Chinese economy. In other words, we grew the equivalent of the economy of China in little more than four years.Yet Greenspan made sure the Fed's printing presses worked overtime. Thus for the first time since the 1970s and early 1980s, we are faced with a serious inflation problem. Thanks to Greenspan's blunder, all commodities shot up -- oil, cooper, lumber, steel, even the price of mud.
While Greenspan begat the inflationary blunder, Ben Bernanke, the maestro's successor, perpetuated it. In 2003 the price of oil was around $25 a barrel. A year ago when the credit crisis hit, oil was around $70. Then Bernanke ginned up the printing presses again, this time to deal with the fallout of the busts of sub prime mortgages and other exotic financial instruments and the threats they posed to the banking system. The U.S. economy has crawled to a virtual halt since August 2007 and yet the price of oil has almost doubled. That's not supply and demand, that's classic inflation.
THE BULLSHIT EATERSThe name certainly fits the theme and conclusion of this analysis.
Everyone knows [fixing socialized education] is a long, hard slog, but Mr. Obama and his wife aren't waiting. Their daughters attend the private University of Chicago Laboratory Schools, where annual tuition ranges from $15,528 for kindergarten to $20,445 for high school.I was just looking it up, and it turns out the typical big city school district spends twice or three times as much money as does the school district which my own children attend. The Chicago school district currently spends $10,555 per student, a sum much larger than that spent per student by the district my children attend. 40% of Chicago's public school teachers send their own kids to private schools, so Obama has massive company among fellow leftwing anti-choice hypocrites in Chicago.
if you search for $0 - $5,000 price range in Detroit, MI, you will find 1,397 properties in that range, out of 20,881 properties for sale.That was six months ago.
Detroit collects 87 percent of its property taxes on average -- one of the lowest collection rates among large cities in the United States. Most cities collect 98 percent.Detroit estimates it loses $60 million in uncollected property taxes every year, with more than $1 billion lost in the past 20 years .. Records indicate that one-third of all properties in the city are tax delinquent, and more than $165 million is owed.
Yet in many cases, city officials have no idea who owns -- or owes -- what. Records are shoddy and rife with inaccuracies.
Of the 389,000 tax bills mailed this summer, as many as 40,000 will return stamped "undeliverable," says City Treasurer Clarence Williams.
70,000 properties in the city are eligible for foreclosure, the city takes only 1,500 parcels a year ..
Some 130,000 of the city's 400,000 parcels are listed as tax delinquent.
A year ago, the house at 920 W. Camile St. in Santa Ana was bank-owned, deserted and tagged with gang graffiti, a symbol of how the subprime lending bonanza had blighted a city block.
In October, the house sold at auction for $304,500, little more than half what a buyer using 100-percent subprime financing paid in 2006.
Today, 920 W. Camile has been renovated, repainted and floored with faux marble. It resold in January for $625,000, according to county records - a $125,000 down payment and a $500,000 mortgage from Wells Fargo Bank.
Note well that Wells Fargo also made the loan on the $304,500 sale:
In November, Wells Fargo issued a $289,275 mortgage for 920 W. Camile to an investor who had purchased the home at a foreclosure auction. In January, after the house was spruced up, Wells Fargo issued a $500,000 mortgage to the new owners, the Gomezes.The Congress, the Fed, the President and the finance industry are creating ghastly nightmares for countless American families, all in the name of "spreading" the American dream to own a home. When it comes to government, beware what you wish.
The bill will add at least $42 billion in new expenses to the federal budget, including $16.8 billion in new taxes for taxpayers, and new deficit spending, It will include billions of dollars in new pork for "community development" and "mortgage counseling," enriching groups like the scandal-plagued ACORN, which engages in vote fraud, and La Raza.The Bush presidency is really going out in style.
Some day it may begin to dawn on attentive observers that Obama represents a type that flourishes on many college campuses. The technical term that applies to Obama is b.s. artist. Obama is an overaged example of the phenomenon, but his skills in the art have brought him great success and he's not giving it up now.Powerline is echoing the comments of a poster at Patterico:
When I was going to college, there was a dude, a B.M.O.C., who was the best at everything to hear him tell it. He was always hitting on the coeds, or lying about his accomplishments both to facultiy and fellow students. Barrack was, without doubt this sort of person. Bullshit is bullshit. This idiot will say anything and then deny he said it.I remember the type. We used to speak of getting out the shovel when these guys talked. A not unusual type was something of an outsider who thought he was imitating what everyone else was doing and saying. If you read Obama's memoir, you find Obama directly stating that this is what he found himself doing during his young life, imitating what he thinks others are doing . So this life as a bullshit artist is a lifelong behavior patter for Obama.
we all know by now that Obama has the ugly habit of repeating lefty tropes, blithely unconcerned about their accuracy or lack thereof.Actually, I think a lot of people aren't much aware of this, because they don't much follow the blatherings of the academics or the NY Times, and aren't aware of where these lies and idiocies come from. And a big slice of other folks have soaked up this stuff at college and from the media and they're utterly oblivious to dishonesty and falsehood of it all. So, no, we don't "all know" about this ugly habit.
[Contrary to the BS of Paul Krugman] Fannie Mae and Mr. Mozilo [at Counrywide] weren't competitors; they were partners. Fannie helped to make Countrywide as profitable as it once was by buying its mortgages in bulk. Mr. Raines -- following predecessor Jim Johnson -- and Mr. Mozilo made each other rich. Which explains why Mr. Johnson could feel so comfortable asking Sen. Kent Conrad (D., N.D.) to discuss a sweetheart mortgage with Mr. Mozilo, and also explains the Mozilo-Raines tag team [attacking Gigot] in 2003. I recount all this now because it illustrates the perverse nature of Fannie and Freddie that has made them such a relentless and untouchable political force. Their unique clout derives from a combination of liberal ideology and private profit. Fannie has been able to purchase political immunity for decades by disguising its vast profit-making machine in the cloak of "affordable housing." To be more precise, Fan and Fred have been protected by an alliance of Capitol Hill and Wall Street, of Barney Frank and Angelo Mozilo.
I know this because for more than six years I've been one of their antagonists. Any editor worth his expense account makes enemies, and complaints from CEOs, politicians and World Bank presidents are common. But Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are unique in their thuggery, and their response to critics may help readers appreciate why taxpayers are now explicitly on the hook to rescue companies that some of us have spent years warning about ..
Also this:
Fan and Fred also couldn't prosper for as long as they have without the support of the political left, both in Congress and the intellectual class. This includes Mr. Frank and Sen. Chuck Schumer (D., N.Y.) on Capitol Hill, as well as Mr. Krugman and the Washington Post's Steven Pearlstein in the press. Their claim is that the companies are essential for homeownership. Yet as studies have shown, about half of the implicit taxpayer subsidy for Fan and Fred is pocketed by shareholders and management ..
And that's about all you need to know about the left today. It's a twisted, corrupt cover for a massive plundering of wealth and grasping of power, and academics like Krugman are simply the most intellectually dishonest of the bunch.
UPDATE: Thomas Sowell on the Democrats and the banks.Some people thought that I was too hard on the former managers of Fannie Mae, whose greed and misconduct in their Enron-style accounting scandal of 2003-4 helped to destroy the soundness of a huge quasi-government agency.
Now comes Paul Gigot recounting just how thuggish their behavior was. The Fannie Mae officials at the time made millions in unearned profits from phony accounting to maximize their bonuses while trying to intimidate -- and when that didn't work, to destroy -- any politician who dared to stand up to their corruption.
So it has to be acknowledged that, on the level of cultural and historical symbolism, an Obama presidency might nudge the culture forward a bit -- presuming of course that he would be at least a competent president. (A less-than-competent black president would likely be a step backwards.)The complication here is that from the point of view of what is best for America, most of Obama's policies will be incompetent. But from the point of view of America's leftist elite, Obama's policies will be understood as successful, competent policies. And the elite will willfully see the causes of any bad consequences for America where ever is most convenient to themselves and their ideology, rather than were those causes actually lie. So America will likely be torn by Obama the way America was torn by FDR -- whose gross incompetence during the Great Depression is only now being revealed for anyone who cares to study the matter, were as at the time FDR's ideological partisans could only see brilliance and success, even in the midst of endless economic stagnation and massive unemployment.
Already [Obama] has flip-flopped on campaign financing, wire-tapping, gun control, faith-based initiatives, and the terms of withdrawal from Iraq. Those enamored of his cultural potential may say these reversals are an indication of thoughtfulness, or even open-mindedness. But could it be that this is a man who trusted so much in his cultural appeal that the struggles of principle and conscience never seemed quite real to him? His flip-flops belie an almost existential callowness toward principle, as if the very idea of permanent truth is passé, a form of bad taste.
Commodities like oil are priced in dollars. So when the dollar becomes weak, the dollar price of commodities goes up. And when the greenback is strong, the dollar price of commodities goes down.In 2004 Alan Greenspan, Chairman of the Federal Reserve, made a fateful miscalculation. The maestro, as he was then affectionately called by an adoring media, miscalculated the strength of the U.S. economy. He thought it weak. He was fearful that prices would collapse in America as they did in Japan during the 1990s and the early part of this decade. So to goose the economy, Greenspan created excessive amounts of money. Interest rates were kept artificially low.
But the economy was not weak. In fact, between 2003 and the summer of 2007, the growth alone of the U.S. economy exceeded the entire size of the Chinese economy. In other words, we grew the equivalent of the economy of China in little more than four years.Yet Greenspan made sure the Fed's printing presses worked overtime. Thus for the first time since the 1970s and early 1980s, we are faced with a serious inflation problem. Thanks to Greenspan's blunder, all commodities shot up -- oil, cooper, lumber, steel, even the price of mud.
While Greenspan begat the inflationary blunder, Ben Bernanke, the maestro's successor, perpetuated it. In 2003 the price of oil was around $25 a barrel. A year ago when the credit crisis hit, oil was around $70. Then Bernanke ginned up the printing presses again, this time to deal with the fallout of the busts of sub prime mortgages and other exotic financial instruments and the threats they posed to the banking system. The U.S. economy has crawled to a virtual halt since August 2007 and yet the price of oil has almost doubled. That's not supply and demand, that's classic inflation.
THE BULLSHIT EATERSThe name certainly fits the theme and conclusion of this analysis.
Everyone knows [fixing socialized education] is a long, hard slog, but Mr. Obama and his wife aren't waiting. Their daughters attend the private University of Chicago Laboratory Schools, where annual tuition ranges from $15,528 for kindergarten to $20,445 for high school.I was just looking it up, and it turns out the typical big city school district spends twice or three times as much money as does the school district which my own children attend. The Chicago school district currently spends $10,555 per student, a sum much larger than that spent per student by the district my children attend. 40% of Chicago's public school teachers send their own kids to private schools, so Obama has massive company among fellow leftwing anti-choice hypocrites in Chicago.
if you search for $0 - $5,000 price range in Detroit, MI, you will find 1,397 properties in that range, out of 20,881 properties for sale.That was six months ago.
Detroit collects 87 percent of its property taxes on average -- one of the lowest collection rates among large cities in the United States. Most cities collect 98 percent.Detroit estimates it loses $60 million in uncollected property taxes every year, with more than $1 billion lost in the past 20 years .. Records indicate that one-third of all properties in the city are tax delinquent, and more than $165 million is owed.
Yet in many cases, city officials have no idea who owns -- or owes -- what. Records are shoddy and rife with inaccuracies.
Of the 389,000 tax bills mailed this summer, as many as 40,000 will return stamped "undeliverable," says City Treasurer Clarence Williams.
70,000 properties in the city are eligible for foreclosure, the city takes only 1,500 parcels a year ..
Some 130,000 of the city's 400,000 parcels are listed as tax delinquent.
A year ago, the house at 920 W. Camile St. in Santa Ana was bank-owned, deserted and tagged with gang graffiti, a symbol of how the subprime lending bonanza had blighted a city block.
In October, the house sold at auction for $304,500, little more than half what a buyer using 100-percent subprime financing paid in 2006.
Today, 920 W. Camile has been renovated, repainted and floored with faux marble. It resold in January for $625,000, according to county records - a $125,000 down payment and a $500,000 mortgage from Wells Fargo Bank.
Note well that Wells Fargo also made the loan on the $304,500 sale:
In November, Wells Fargo issued a $289,275 mortgage for 920 W. Camile to an investor who had purchased the home at a foreclosure auction. In January, after the house was spruced up, Wells Fargo issued a $500,000 mortgage to the new owners, the Gomezes.The Congress, the Fed, the President and the finance industry are creating ghastly nightmares for countless American families, all in the name of "spreading" the American dream to own a home. When it comes to government, beware what you wish.
The bill will add at least $42 billion in new expenses to the federal budget, including $16.8 billion in new taxes for taxpayers, and new deficit spending, It will include billions of dollars in new pork for "community development" and "mortgage counseling," enriching groups like the scandal-plagued ACORN, which engages in vote fraud, and La Raza.The Bush presidency is really going out in style.
Some day it may begin to dawn on attentive observers that Obama represents a type that flourishes on many college campuses. The technical term that applies to Obama is b.s. artist. Obama is an overaged example of the phenomenon, but his skills in the art have brought him great success and he's not giving it up now.Powerline is echoing the comments of a poster at Patterico:
When I was going to college, there was a dude, a B.M.O.C., who was the best at everything to hear him tell it. He was always hitting on the coeds, or lying about his accomplishments both to facultiy and fellow students. Barrack was, without doubt this sort of person. Bullshit is bullshit. This idiot will say anything and then deny he said it.I remember the type. We used to speak of getting out the shovel when these guys talked. A not unusual type was something of an outsider who thought he was imitating what everyone else was doing and saying. If you read Obama's memoir, you find Obama directly stating that this is what he found himself doing during his young life, imitating what he thinks others are doing . So this life as a bullshit artist is a lifelong behavior patter for Obama.
we all know by now that Obama has the ugly habit of repeating lefty tropes, blithely unconcerned about their accuracy or lack thereof.Actually, I think a lot of people aren't much aware of this, because they don't much follow the blatherings of the academics or the NY Times, and aren't aware of where these lies and idiocies come from. And a big slice of other folks have soaked up this stuff at college and from the media and they're utterly oblivious to dishonesty and falsehood of it all. So, no, we don't "all know" about this ugly habit.
[Contrary to the BS of Paul Krugman] Fannie Mae and Mr. Mozilo [at Counrywide] weren't competitors; they were partners. Fannie helped to make Countrywide as profitable as it once was by buying its mortgages in bulk. Mr. Raines -- following predecessor Jim Johnson -- and Mr. Mozilo made each other rich. Which explains why Mr. Johnson could feel so comfortable asking Sen. Kent Conrad (D., N.D.) to discuss a sweetheart mortgage with Mr. Mozilo, and also explains the Mozilo-Raines tag team [attacking Gigot] in 2003. I recount all this now because it illustrates the perverse nature of Fannie and Freddie that has made them such a relentless and untouchable political force. Their unique clout derives from a combination of liberal ideology and private profit. Fannie has been able to purchase political immunity for decades by disguising its vast profit-making machine in the cloak of "affordable housing." To be more precise, Fan and Fred have been protected by an alliance of Capitol Hill and Wall Street, of Barney Frank and Angelo Mozilo.
I know this because for more than six years I've been one of their antagonists. Any editor worth his expense account makes enemies, and complaints from CEOs, politicians and World Bank presidents are common. But Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are unique in their thuggery, and their response to critics may help readers appreciate why taxpayers are now explicitly on the hook to rescue companies that some of us have spent years warning about ..
Also this:
Fan and Fred also couldn't prosper for as long as they have without the support of the political left, both in Congress and the intellectual class. This includes Mr. Frank and Sen. Chuck Schumer (D., N.Y.) on Capitol Hill, as well as Mr. Krugman and the Washington Post's Steven Pearlstein in the press. Their claim is that the companies are essential for homeownership. Yet as studies have shown, about half of the implicit taxpayer subsidy for Fan and Fred is pocketed by shareholders and management ..
And that's about all you need to know about the left today. It's a twisted, corrupt cover for a massive plundering of wealth and grasping of power, and academics like Krugman are simply the most intellectually dishonest of the bunch.
UPDATE: Thomas Sowell on the Democrats and the banks.Some people thought that I was too hard on the former managers of Fannie Mae, whose greed and misconduct in their Enron-style accounting scandal of 2003-4 helped to destroy the soundness of a huge quasi-government agency.
Now comes Paul Gigot recounting just how thuggish their behavior was. The Fannie Mae officials at the time made millions in unearned profits from phony accounting to maximize their bonuses while trying to intimidate -- and when that didn't work, to destroy -- any politician who dared to stand up to their corruption.
So it has to be acknowledged that, on the level of cultural and historical symbolism, an Obama presidency might nudge the culture forward a bit -- presuming of course that he would be at least a competent president. (A less-than-competent black president would likely be a step backwards.)The complication here is that from the point of view of what is best for America, most of Obama's policies will be incompetent. But from the point of view of America's leftist elite, Obama's policies will be understood as successful, competent policies. And the elite will willfully see the causes of any bad consequences for America where ever is most convenient to themselves and their ideology, rather than were those causes actually lie. So America will likely be torn by Obama the way America was torn by FDR -- whose gross incompetence during the Great Depression is only now being revealed for anyone who cares to study the matter, were as at the time FDR's ideological partisans could only see brilliance and success, even in the midst of endless economic stagnation and massive unemployment.
Already [Obama] has flip-flopped on campaign financing, wire-tapping, gun control, faith-based initiatives, and the terms of withdrawal from Iraq. Those enamored of his cultural potential may say these reversals are an indication of thoughtfulness, or even open-mindedness. But could it be that this is a man who trusted so much in his cultural appeal that the struggles of principle and conscience never seemed quite real to him? His flip-flops belie an almost existential callowness toward principle, as if the very idea of permanent truth is passé, a form of bad taste.